What is the difference between alinsky and freire

The organizer makes it clear that organization will give them the power, the ability, the strength, the force to be able to do something about these particular problems. It is then that a bad scene begins to break up into specific issues, because now the people can do something about it. What the organizer does is convert the plight into a problem. The issues to be addressed through the community organization must be selected appropriately. This stands in contrast to other strategies that may integrate broader ideological issues into organizing, such as antiracism or antiviolence campaigns Sen ; Su Related to this focus on a specific, winnable issue, Alinsky also asserted the importance of choosing a campaign target—a specific individual or organization that has the power to make decisions and therefore make change Sen For example, when organizing with the low-income African American com- munity in Rochester, New York, Alinsky identified Eastman Kodak, the antilabor industrial giant of Rochester, as being largely responsible for the economic plight of the community.

Alinsky then personalized and polarized this target by deliberately expressing confusion over the identity of one of the directors of Eastman Kodak. Allen Wallis had a history of discriminating against African Americans in his position as president of the local university. At the time, Alabama governor George Wallace was a strong segregationist; in he had famously stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to stop two black students from entering.

Therefore, the initial focus of Alinsky organizing efforts is to build the organization through recruitment of huge numbers of people. In the end, this kind of social action organizing serves to shift power from being concentrated among elite power brokers to being shared with previously marginalized communities, which, through their organizing into a mass power base, gain access to the decision-making table.

In the following passage, Alinsky dramatically illustrates how community organizing moves individuals from a place of invisibility and voice- lessness to that of visibility and influence: A man is living in a slum tenement. When the organizer approaches him part of what begins to be communicated is that through the organization and its power he will get his birth certificate for life, that he will become known, that things will change from the drabness of a life where all that changes is the calendar.

Mayor, we have had it up to here and we are not going to take it any more. Nobody ever asked him what he thought about anything before. In this effort, a dozen ISAIAH leaders, wearing beards and stovetop hats, greeted legisla- tors as the latter entered a House transportation hearing.

A similarly Alinsky-style tactic involved their organization of a mass demonstration in front of the head- quarters of UnitedHealth—the largest private health insurance company in the United States.

By comparing models of community enterprise I shall reflect on future opportunities of a budding community enterprise. Finally by outlining the methods of evaluation I shall reflect on my chosen framework for evaluation of my work. Methodology: I have applied a qualitative methodology for this essay to provide a literature review and given examples, where relevant, drawn from my practical experiences of working with communities in Bordesley Green BG , Birmingham and in overseas.

Their theories are based upon organising communities from the below, who are most deprived, socially isolated and segregated and disempowered due to social, economic and political systems. Philosophy and Theory, Vol. S1, , USA. Strathern, M. Get Access. Better Essays. Organizational Development from the Social Science Perspective. Read More. Best Essays. Personal Development as a Critical Practitioner. Issues Of Sweatshops Words 3 Pages. Issues Of Sweatshops.

Powerful Essays. Satisfactory Essays. Good Essays. What Is Brand Meaning? Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

However, within the text, principles for Organising are observed that appear to be the focus of current usage of Alinsky by the Coalition; an example includes18; 1. Draw on the inevitability of class and group conflict as well as the unpredictability of events for your creativity to invent tactics that fit the moment.

Be guided by a broadly defined sense of self-interest, taking on multiple issues, and encourage all other participants to do the same 3.

Try to see every situation in as stark a light as possible, unblurred by ideological imperatives, traditional hatreds, or conventional moralities 4. Communicate with others on their own ground, amassing personal experience and solid relationships among the people with whom you intend to work 5. IAF members then use those new political realities to invent and establish new social realities.

In the UK, the College of Community Organising offers a series of training and consultancy opportunities As such, the Alinsky workshop appears to focus on capabilities for generation, maintenance, and effective application of collective power by coherent communities supported by embedded Organiser facilitators.

The training and preparation of communities and leaders for power, together with guidelines for leverage of that power are core aspects of an Alinsky-informed approach A step-by-step guidebook is not clearly apparent but may exist behind IAF and London Citizen firewalls. In other words, the individual is supported to cultivate their own growth.

One animator will organise a team that delivers the programme. The listening dialogue leads to people promising to take an action. A few will set up projects and enterprises that will tackle major concerns that many in the network will use. Leaders will emerge with projects, actions and enterprises and the area will regenerate.